Sometimes while watching some reality shows, politician's comments, discussing things, or simply observing someone - we are compelled to think - "Are you kidding me ? How one can possibly be so dumb!". And the second thought which comes in mind is - "I really wonder he was the fittest of the million sperms racing with him".
Survival of the fittest - a theory by Charles Darwin. He proposed that there will be limited resources(egg) and many competitors(sperms). So, for fertilizing the only egg, fittest of the sperms will win.
Just imagine that dumb guy once more. Could he have defeated a million or more ? Nah! even if there would have been only 20 competitors, he would have been beaten. Even he wouldn't have known when to start and where to end.
Remembering some scenes from movie - "Vicky Donor", there was a guy, Dr. Chaddha, who was giving his expert comments after observing activities of a person. If not comments, he coined adjectives for different people like - lazy sperm, angry sperm, confused sperm and so on.
For a moment, let's assume that he was right in coining those terms. Those people have originated with the sperm with the characteristics now they are showing. There might have been millions of sperms with different characteristics and one of them was chosen. Yes, I am saying that, might be there would have been only selection but not purely competition.
Not getting me ??? Let me try to make it simpler.
Have you ever been to college? No? Doesn't matter. Having so many people around you, have you ever came across this thought - "Why me or that good fellow is not having a girlfriend while the least handsome (or ugliest - your preference) among all is having one???" OR "Why in this universe that girl is with that guy???" You are striking right on the logic behind the selection.
Women choose like this only, they like what they like and no logic is required to support that choice. If a girl likes Blackberry phone, you can't convince her that Android is better. If she thinks Rahul Gandhi can change India's fortune, you can't change her. At the best what you can get is - "Can we stop this discussion, please change the topic...". That's the way they think.
So what I am trying to say is the egg in ovary is somewhat like a woman, after all it is produced by her, and the million sperms are the guys proposing her for selecting them. So there is competition for proposing but selection might not be based on it. She will not select one but he might not be the fittest or smartest of all.
Atleast this way we will not be surprised by thinking that this dumb guy was the fittest of all. Only drawback is that those guys will lose that achievement that once in their lifetime(even before they came to earth) they were the fastest or fittest.
It has been written for light humor, Charles Darwin hadn't said exactly the way i said but that's the way most people understands it and am not a misogynist. Sorry if any lady feels offended.
Thanks for reading :)
Survival of the fittest - a theory by Charles Darwin. He proposed that there will be limited resources(egg) and many competitors(sperms). So, for fertilizing the only egg, fittest of the sperms will win.
Just imagine that dumb guy once more. Could he have defeated a million or more ? Nah! even if there would have been only 20 competitors, he would have been beaten. Even he wouldn't have known when to start and where to end.
Remembering some scenes from movie - "Vicky Donor", there was a guy, Dr. Chaddha, who was giving his expert comments after observing activities of a person. If not comments, he coined adjectives for different people like - lazy sperm, angry sperm, confused sperm and so on.
For a moment, let's assume that he was right in coining those terms. Those people have originated with the sperm with the characteristics now they are showing. There might have been millions of sperms with different characteristics and one of them was chosen. Yes, I am saying that, might be there would have been only selection but not purely competition.
Not getting me ??? Let me try to make it simpler.
Have you ever been to college? No? Doesn't matter. Having so many people around you, have you ever came across this thought - "Why me or that good fellow is not having a girlfriend while the least handsome (or ugliest - your preference) among all is having one???" OR "Why in this universe that girl is with that guy???" You are striking right on the logic behind the selection.
Women choose like this only, they like what they like and no logic is required to support that choice. If a girl likes Blackberry phone, you can't convince her that Android is better. If she thinks Rahul Gandhi can change India's fortune, you can't change her. At the best what you can get is - "Can we stop this discussion, please change the topic...". That's the way they think.
So what I am trying to say is the egg in ovary is somewhat like a woman, after all it is produced by her, and the million sperms are the guys proposing her for selecting them. So there is competition for proposing but selection might not be based on it. She will not select one but he might not be the fittest or smartest of all.
Atleast this way we will not be surprised by thinking that this dumb guy was the fittest of all. Only drawback is that those guys will lose that achievement that once in their lifetime(even before they came to earth) they were the fastest or fittest.
It has been written for light humor, Charles Darwin hadn't said exactly the way i said but that's the way most people understands it and am not a misogynist. Sorry if any lady feels offended.
Thanks for reading :)
No comments:
Post a Comment